INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND GLOBAL TAX "WAR"
Hi, guys! Let´s talk a little about something really outstanding recently: a global tax "war" that is happening currently after the decisions made for the North-American president, when he started a massive tax project, affecting the whole world.
What´s your opinion about that?
And about Brazil? Do you see more advantages or disadvantages with the massive tax?
Write your opinion down here and talk to more people interested in this topic.
Have fun!
Hello,
ResponderExcluirThe adoption of a massive tax in both the United States and Brazil brings benefits in the search for social justice and greater economic balance, allowing the government to invest more in essential areas. However, it is essential that these measures are well planned, so as not to discourage investment or overburden companies and workers, thus ensuring sustainable economic growth and a more just society.
My opinion on the taxation issue by the American president is that he ends up isolating the country. This causes a huge global impact, but it also enables markets to create new alliances. This is good for Brazil because Brazil can stand out due to having a greater range of possibilities for foreign trade within our country today. As we are strong in agriculture and in some raw materials that other countries don't have, I believe this is an opportunity for Brazil to stand out again among markets and form new alliances.
ResponderExcluirHi everyone! This topic is really interesting and important.
ResponderExcluirIn my opinion, the global tax changes led by the U.S. can create a lot of pressure on other countries to adapt. It may help standardize tax systems and reduce unfair advantages for big multinational companies. However, it can also harm smaller economies that rely on competitive tax rates to attract investment.
As for Brazil, I believe there are more disadvantages. Brazil already has a complex and heavy tax system, and new global pressures might make it even harder to simplify or reduce taxes. That could affect business growth, investment, and job creation. On the other hand, if managed well, this pressure could encourage long-overdue tax reform.
Let’s keep the conversation going — it’s a global issue that affects us all!
Hi everyone! In my opinion, this global tax "war" is a very serious issue that can bring negative impacts to many countries. The decision made by the North-American president to increase taxes affects global trade and creates instability in international markets.
ResponderExcluirWhen it comes to Brazil, I believe there are more disadvantages than advantages. Our economy depends a lot on exports, especially agricultural products and raw materials. With higher taxes and trade barriers, Brazilian products may lose competitiveness abroad. This can reduce our exports, affect jobs, and slow down economic growth.
On the other hand, it could be an opportunity to strengthen the internal market, but overall, I think the disadvantages are stronger than the benefits. It’s important for countries to find solutions through dialogue and cooperation instead of starting trade wars.
Hi everyone! In my opinion, this global tax “war” is bringing more negative effects than positive ones. When the North-American president decided to start a massive tax project, it created a lot of tension in the international market. Many countries are now facing difficulties with exports and imports because of higher taxes.
ResponderExcluirTalking about Brazil, I believe there are more disadvantages than advantages. Our economy depends a lot on exporting products like soy, meat, and minerals. With the massive tax, it becomes harder for Brazilian products to compete in the international market. This can reduce jobs, affect companies, and slow down economic growth.
On the other hand, it could push Brazil to focus more on the internal market and invest in local industries. But in general, I think the disadvantages are bigger.
What about you guys? Let’s discuss this!
The tax changes initiated by the president in the US are causing much discussion around the world, as it affects all countries that have a trade agreement with the US. As a consequence, other countries are under pressure from outside and may face isolation or a counterattack.
ResponderExcluirIn Brazil, the tax charged is the same as the country's. However, there is still room for new trade agreements, as they are part of important groups such as BRICS, as Brazil is a major exporter of agricultural products and crude oils, which makes it stand out. This can already be seen with the rapprochement between Brazil and China.
Good afternoon, everyone! As the activity asked, I will answer the questions here on the blog.
ResponderExcluirThe first sentence says that British companies don’t sell to other countries. That’s wrong. They do export cars, machines, oil, and services. The second sentence says that multinational companies sell the same products in all markets. That’s also wrong because they usually adapt their products to each country, following the idea of “think global, act local.”
The third sentence says that increased competition is good for producers and bad for customers. This is incorrect. Competition is actually good for customers because prices go down and there are more options. For producers, profits might decrease, but competition also encourages improvements. Lastly, the fourth sentence says changes in the exchange rate don’t affect international trade, which is wrong. Exchange rates matter a lot: when the currency falls, exporting becomes cheaper; when it rises, it gets more expensive.
Now, some important vocabulary:
Labour costs means the cost of labor,
Foreign currency is foreign money,
Exchange rate is the currency exchange rate,
Subsidiaries are subsidiaries,
Multinational companies are multinational companies,
Exports are exports,
Overseas markets are international markets,
and Imports are imports.
About choosing between two markets: Market A has high competition, a stable exchange rate, cheap labor, and a population with high income. Market B has medium competition, an unstable exchange rate, expensive labor, and a population with medium income. I would choose Market A because, even with more competition, it has more advantages: a stable currency, lower costs, and people with more buying power.
Hey everyone!
ResponderExcluirAs a commercial manager, I can’t help but notice how global economic decisions directly impact business strategies, sales, and market competitiveness.
Right now, we’re witnessing a real global tax war, sparked by the recent U.S. tax reform aimed at raising taxes on multinational corporations and large fortunes. But it doesn’t stop there — the ripple effects are felt worldwide, including here in Brazil.
⚠️ Why does this matter for those of us in business?
Because international trade is an ecosystem: when a major player changes the rules, everyone else has to rethink their strategies. This affects product pricing, access to global markets, and most importantly, the ability of Brazilian companies to compete globally and locally.
📌 And what about Brazil?
We’ve faced long-standing challenges: complex bureaucracy, high tax burdens, and an environment that discourages foreign investment. While the world adapts, Brazil must decide: will we modernize and attract global opportunities, or keep losing ground?
🔎 For those of us on the commercial front line, this means:
✅ New challenges in pricing strategies
✅ Direct impact on customers’ purchasing power
✅ Strategic shifts in market expansion plans
💬 I want to hear your thoughts:
➡️ Do you see more opportunities or risks for Brazil in this scenario?
➡️ How could this impact your market or industry?
Let’s talk about it. Sharing ideas is a smart way to prepare for what’s coming. 📈🤝
The U.S. has launched an ambitious tax reform that's already affecting the entire world. Leading an international agreement, the country is pushing for a global minimum corporate tax, aiming to curb capital flight and ensure that multinational companies pay taxes where they actually operate.
ResponderExcluirFor Brazil, this could be a positive shift: it may increase tax revenue and reduce fiscal inequality. However, it also presents challenges, such as a potential loss of competitiveness if not paired with tax simplification and improvements in the business environment.
Adopting this new model could benefit Brazil, but only if accompanied by structural reforms. Without them, a heavy tax burden may do more harm than good.
Hi, everyone!
ResponderExcluirI think this global tax “war” is something we really need to pay attention to. The U.S. made big changes in their taxes, and now other countries are feeling the pressure. It can be good for them, but also creates problems around the world.
Talking about Brazil, our tax system is already complicated, and if we try to make big changes without a good plan, it might get even worse. It could hurt small businesses and make things more expensive. I believe Brazil needs to simplify taxes and make things easier for people and companies, instead of just following what other countries do.
Hello, everyone!
ResponderExcluirThis global tax “war” is definitely a challenge, but I also see it as a chance for Brazil to rethink its global strategy. As major economies like the U.S. change their tax systems, countries that move fast and modernize can attract new investments and build stronger trade relationships.
Brazil has a lot to offer — especially in agriculture, energy, and natural resources — but to take advantage of the global shift, we need to simplify our tax system and show stability to the international market.
In this context, I believe the global tax reform could be an opportunity — if Brazil uses it to push real improvements. Otherwise, we might just feel the negative effects without getting any of the benefits.
Hello, my opinion on this tax war is that it only harms the population, since what is usually done is to pass the taxes on, the manufacturer passes the amount on to the seller, and the seller passes it on to the end buyer. In my opinion, this is very common in Brazil, and it presents itself as a disadvantage for the population
ResponderExcluirI think the global tax "war" shows how connected all economies are. When the U.S. changes taxes, it affects many countries. In Brazil, I see more disadvantages, like less investment and higher costs for companies. But it can also push for better reforms...
ResponderExcluirHello, everyone!
ResponderExcluirThis global tax “war” that started with the US tax bill really draws attention, especially because of its impact on international production chains and competitiveness between countries. The decision to increase taxation on large companies, especially multinationals, can be seen as an attempt to curb tax evasion and strengthen domestic tax collection. However, this also generates chain reactions, with other countries adopting similar measures or creating incentives to maintain investments.
In Brazil's case, I believe this movement brings both opportunities and challenges. On the one hand, there is a chance to rethink our tax structure, making it fairer and more efficient - something much needed. On the other hand, we run the risk of losing competitiveness, especially if we don't make progress on structural reforms and continue with a cumbersome and bureaucratic system.
I see more disadvantages in the short term, especially for companies that already face a high tax burden here. But if we take advantage of the moment to modernize our model, the benefits could come in the medium and long term.
I think os good to Brasil, because the our nation can get more "clients" interesting in our products.
ResponderExcluir